You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 6, 2023. It is now read-only.
It would be extremely helpful to see a compatibility matrix between the broker server (cbd) and broker modules on pollers.
Something that @julienmathis referred to in #81 (comment) but I was unable to find such compatibility matrix on a website for recent versions of Centreon (20.10 and up).
Having a compatibility between different broker versions from different centreon distributions (pollers) is critical in designing a upgrade path between Centreon version especially when running multiple (hundreds) of pollers with one HA central. Its usually unfeasible to do a big-bang upgrade so the compatibility matrix is the only solution for this IMO.
From tests I know that 21.04 poller module is compatible with 20.10 cbd, but I would love to see the full matrix.
Hi @hecko ,
As you can see in my commits, I am not working on the development of this project.
Maybe @bouda1 will be able to help you.
Best regards,
sc979
It would be extremely helpful to see a compatibility matrix between the broker server (cbd) and broker modules on pollers.
Something that @julienmathis referred to in #81 (comment) but I was unable to find such compatibility matrix on a website for recent versions of Centreon (20.10 and up).
Having a compatibility between different broker versions from different centreon distributions (pollers) is critical in designing a upgrade path between Centreon version especially when running multiple (hundreds) of pollers with one HA central. Its usually unfeasible to do a big-bang upgrade so the compatibility matrix is the only solution for this IMO.
From tests I know that 21.04 poller module is compatible with 20.10 cbd, but I would love to see the full matrix.
Is such compatibility matrix available @sc979 ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: