Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EMA-VFI interpolation and RVRT #228

Open
zelenooki87 opened this issue Apr 7, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

EMA-VFI interpolation and RVRT #228

zelenooki87 opened this issue Apr 7, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
Arch request Request to add support for an architecture

Comments

@zelenooki87
Copy link

Hi,

I noticed you've begun implementing support for video super-resolution (VRT) and FLAVR. When can we expect these features to be officially "working" in the Chainer framework?

I also have a suggestion: consider adding RVRT as a potential architecture. It's by the same author as VRT but less computationally expensive. https://github.com/JingyunLiang/RVRT

One more request: EMA-VFI interpolation is one of the best open sourced, interpolation methods available right now. Could you please consider including it as well? https://github.com/MCG-NJU/EMA-VFI

Thanks!

@RunDevelopment RunDevelopment added the Arch request Request to add support for an architecture label Apr 7, 2024
@RunDevelopment
Copy link
Member

same author as VRT but less computationally expensive.

And more complex architecturally :)

I plan to add support for a lot more video SR and frame interpolation architectures in the future. This first PR just includes a few architectures, so I can figure out how to build the necessary infrastructure.

@zelenooki87
Copy link
Author

This sounds great! By the way, I noticed that the safmn GitHub repository has been updated with new models. Could you update the safmn architecture in Spandrel to support them? Thanks!
https://github.com/sunny2109/SAFMN

@joeyballentine
Copy link
Member

When can we expect these features to be officially "working" in the Chainer framework?

Potentially soon. We'd just have to implement them in a not very ideal way to work around chaiNNer's limitations. If we wanted to do it correctly, then it would take much much longer

@zelenooki87

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@RunDevelopment

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Arch request Request to add support for an architecture
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants