Request Update #161
Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
Thank you very much for the author's hard work. This is truly an interesting and powerful project. However, I feel that the author's focus is not here but on "bun" instead, as the speed of issue and bug fixes is not fast enough. It's really a pity. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I just found out that there is such a fast Python framework, but unfortunately, it is not being developed 😭. Maybe there are many Python developers who would be willing to help fix bugs and update it. This is the framework I have been looking for. I have encountered a problem where Python frameworks are very slow, but customers need something fast like Go and Rust. Maybe Socketify is the answer to my problem. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
At this moment I'm migrating from CFFI (Python) to HPy (C Extension that supports PyPy and CPython both with better performance than CFFI). Bug fixing is a priority since is not production ready yet and I'm rewriting most of it. I will post a roadmap so we can just see what is being done, and push little by little after the first ASGI and WSGI usable server. This is some of the things I have being done: Performance should improve on PyPy and CPython (CPython should increase in 50% at least and PyPy 10~20%). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I personally still prefer more often updates than this project has. It gives a sense of moving forward. If the project follows the semver, version with major part being 0 suggests, that everything can be changed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If socketify is stable and has good performance and can beat gin and fiber, maybe many will use socketify, and I was very surprised when using socketify it turned out to be very fast and even faster than gin, this is an amazing discovery in my opinion, hopefully socketify will be the top and fastest for python frameworks🐍🐍
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions