Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is it possible to avoid writing too much "Sdeacivate_thread" in C #71

Closed
yjqww6 opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Is it possible to avoid writing too much "Sdeacivate_thread" in C #71

yjqww6 opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@yjqww6
Copy link
Contributor

yjqww6 commented Jun 16, 2016

For example, is it possible to have a new "foreign-procedure" which could automatically deactivate and reactivate threads and a new "foreign-callable" which could automatically activate and deactivate threads?
@dybvig
Copy link
Member

dybvig commented Jun 19, 2016

It's probably possible. Doing so would likely involve modifying both the machine-independent and machine-dependent handling of these forms.

@yjqww6
Copy link
Contributor Author

yjqww6 commented Apr 23, 2018

2230e5a fixed this

@yjqww6 yjqww6 closed this as completed Apr 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@yjqww6 @dybvig