Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for virtual selection in widgets #4579

Closed
szymonkups opened this issue Aug 11, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by ckeditor/ckeditor5-widget#12
Closed

Add support for virtual selection in widgets #4579

szymonkups opened this issue Aug 11, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by ckeditor/ckeditor5-widget#12
Assignees
Labels
package:widget type:feature This issue reports a feature request (an idea for a new functionality or a missing option).
Milestone

Comments

@szymonkups
Copy link
Contributor

Should be closed after https://github.com/ckeditor/ckeditor5-engine/issues/1015.

Virtual selection can be custom-handled by providing setVirtualSelection and removeVirtualSelection custom properties, where virtual selection descriptor is passed. Widgets should be able to handle virtual selection on their own.
Virtual selection descriptor contains priority which should be used to prioritize which virtual selection should be used (always display virtual selection with highest priority).

@szymonkups szymonkups self-assigned this Aug 11, 2017
pjasiun referenced this issue in ckeditor/ckeditor5-widget Aug 18, 2017
Feature: Virtual selection support for widgets. Closes #11.
@mlewand mlewand transferred this issue from ckeditor/ckeditor5-widget Oct 9, 2019
@mlewand mlewand added this to the iteration 11 milestone Oct 9, 2019
@mlewand mlewand added resolution:solved type:feature This issue reports a feature request (an idea for a new functionality or a missing option). package:widget labels Oct 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
package:widget type:feature This issue reports a feature request (an idea for a new functionality or a missing option).
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants