Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xtflog duplicate coord shows different coordinates in <message> and <geometry> #353

Closed
romefi opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@romefi
Copy link

romefi commented Aug 3, 2022

We have an erroneous xtf with lots of duplicate coord. We noticed the coordinates in <message> are different as in <coordinates>. One would expect the coordinates would be identical and for tools like validation in QGIS Model Baker it would be very handy, if shows the actual geometry of the error.

Is this a "bug" or is there a particular reason, why the coordinates are different?

<IliVErrors.ErrorLog.Error TID="o42"><Message>duplicate coord at (2686969.734, 1272526.574, NaN)</Message><Type>Error</Type><ObjTag>Administrative_Einteilung_LV95_V1_0.Administration.Einteilung</ObjTag><Tid>332</Tid><DataSource>/uploads/p1fqGa7o2TF-uhtHJ6W24w/2022_08_3_094745_administrativeEinteilung2.xtf</DataSource><Line>47</Line><Geometry><COORD><C1>2682371.037</C1><C2>1270736.538</C2></COORD></Geometry><TechDetails>logMsg():  (Iox2jtsext.java:278)</TechDetails></IliVErrors.ErrorLog.Error>
<IliVErrors.ErrorLog.Error TID="o43"><Message>duplicate coord at (2688318.723, 1281502.109, NaN)</Message><Type>Error</Type><ObjTag>Administrative_Einteilung_LV95_V1_0.Administration.Einteilung</ObjTag><Tid>332</Tid><DataSource>/uploads/p1fqGa7o2TF-uhtHJ6W24w/2022_08_3_094745_administrativeEinteilung2.xtf</DataSource><Line>47</Line><Geometry><COORD><C1>2682371.037</C1><C2>1270736.538</C2></COORD></Geometry><TechDetails>logMsg():  (Iox2jtsext.java:278)</TechDetails></IliVErrors.ErrorLog.Error>
<IliVErrors.ErrorLog.Error TID="o44"><Message>duplicate coord at (2705907.475, 1280082.508, NaN)</Message><Type>Error</Type><ObjTag>Administrative_Einteilung_LV95_V1_0.Administration.Einteilung</ObjTag><Tid>332</Tid><DataSource>/uploads/p1fqGa7o2TF-uhtHJ6W24w/2022_08_3_094745_administrativeEinteilung2.xtf</DataSource><Line>47</Line><Geometry><COORD><C1>2682371.037</C1><C2>1270736.538</C2></COORD></Geometry><TechDetails>logMsg():  (Iox2jtsext.java:278)</TechDetails></IliVErrors.ErrorLog.Error>
<IliVErrors.ErrorLog.Error TID="o45"><Message>duplicate coord at (2689115.088, 1282971.843, NaN)</Message><Type>Error</Type><ObjTag>Administrative_Einteilung_LV95_V1_0.Administration.Einteilung</ObjTag><Tid>240</Tid><DataSource>/uploads/p1fqGa7o2TF-uhtHJ6W24w/2022_08_3_094745_administrativeEinteilung2.xtf</DataSource><Line>56</Line><Geometry><COORD><C1>2691958.736</C1><C2>1282401.958</C2></COORD></Geometry><TechDetails>logMsg():  (Iox2jtsext.java:278)</TechDetails></IliVErrors.ErrorLog.Error>

You find the XTF and the shortened XTFLOG here: administrativeEinteilung2.zip

@olivergrimm
Copy link

from our point of view this seems to be a bug. I'll get in contact with you

@romefi
Copy link
Author

romefi commented Jan 6, 2023

@olivergrimm I was asked by @signedav about the status of this issue. To be hones I don't remember what we discussed. Is someone going do fix this bug? If not and a donor is needed, could you make me an offer? Thank you.

@olivergrimm
Copy link

@romefi we checked a dependency against claeis/iox-ili#109 and we can exclude it that this bug is impacted from. I sent you an offer by mail last August (22th) and we agreed to tackle that when the new year is here. I sent you the mail again. cc @signedav

claeis added a commit to claeis/iox-ili that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2023
@claeis claeis added this to the 1.13.2 milestone Feb 22, 2023
claeis added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2023
@claeis claeis closed this as completed Feb 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants