You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Common-Lisp and Emacs-Lisp identifiers can start with digits, e.g., 2pi, !, { and } are all valid identifiers. ?, [ and ] are valid identifiers in Common-Lisp. Emacs-Lisp identifiers cannot start with ? and cannot contain [ or ]. The rare, seldom seen #?, #!, #[, #], #{ and #} reader macros reserved for Common-Lisp users are far too obscure to mention.
Given that the https://hyperpolyglot.org/lisp.htmlidentifier info is at least half false,
it might be wise to check the other entries as well. http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/lw50/CLHS/Body/02_cd.htm
2.3.4 Symbols as Tokens
Any token that is not a potential number, does not contain a package marker, and does not consist entirely of dots will always be interpreted as a symbol.
2.3.1.1 Potential Numbers as Tokens
…
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Common-Lisp and Emacs-Lisp identifiers can start with digits, e.g., 2pi, !, { and } are all valid identifiers. ?, [ and ] are valid identifiers in Common-Lisp. Emacs-Lisp identifiers cannot start with ? and cannot contain [ or ]. The rare, seldom seen #?, #!, #[, #], #{ and #} reader macros reserved for Common-Lisp users are far too obscure to mention.
Given that the https://hyperpolyglot.org/lisp.html identifier info is at least half false,
it might be wise to check the other entries as well.
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/lw50/CLHS/Body/02_cd.htm
2.3.4 Symbols as Tokens
Any token that is not a potential number, does not contain a package marker, and does not consist entirely of dots will always be interpreted as a symbol.
2.3.1.1 Potential Numbers as Tokens
…
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: