You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Once the file is cached locally, things are better.
I don't know if there was an intermittent problem with the neurophyla.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk server when I first ran, but if it is possible to host the example files in a faster location that would be a welcome change. Alternatively, maybe we could purposely image something very small to use for tests and just keep the tiny dat files in the repo directly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, downloading those files is slow, although it shouldn't be that slow. You can add the --skip-full argument to pytest, which will skip tests requiring the full .dat file, but still do the tests on the truncated headers vendorised with jeiss-specs.
But as you say, ensuring that the public exemplar of a particular version is a small one would be convenient; that v8 .dat was from the only stack I had easily available.
My first run through this repo's pytests took almost an hour because (I think) of an extremely slow download of https://neurophyla.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/share/fibsem_example/FIBdeSEMAna_21-12-26_005024_0-0-0.dat.
Once the file is cached locally, things are better.
I don't know if there was an intermittent problem with the neurophyla.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk server when I first ran, but if it is possible to host the example files in a faster location that would be a welcome change. Alternatively, maybe we could purposely image something very small to use for tests and just keep the tiny dat files in the repo directly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: