We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wow! The reader emits fake calls to unquote functions— allowing for custom syntax-quote-like macros if you don’t like the one built into the reader:
'~foo
(clojure.core/unquote foo)
'~@foo
(clojure.core/unquote-splicing foo)
Someone in 2008 wanted a syntax-quote without symbol resolution (i.e. quasi-quote) here, and Rich added the fake calls to allow it:
It looks like a canonical quasiquote was published four years later in 2012 (which I had starred and forgot about): https://github.com/brandonbloom/backtick
source: searched on clojurians slack for “syntax quote resolve” and saw all this unearthed by @NoahTheDuke here: https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/C03S1KBA2/p1656779374489749
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Wow! The reader emits fake calls to unquote functions— allowing for custom syntax-quote-like macros if you don’t like the one built into the reader:
'~foo
=>(clojure.core/unquote foo)
'~@foo
=>(clojure.core/unquote-splicing foo)
Someone in 2008 wanted a syntax-quote without symbol resolution (i.e. quasi-quote) here, and Rich added the fake calls to allow it:
It looks like a canonical quasiquote was published four years later in 2012 (which I had starred and forgot about):
https://github.com/brandonbloom/backtick
source: searched on clojurians slack for “syntax quote resolve” and saw all this unearthed by @NoahTheDuke here:
https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/C03S1KBA2/p1656779374489749
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: