Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data "ami" is only compatible with x86 instances #19

Open
jakubserwatka-oktawave opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Data "ami" is only compatible with x86 instances #19

jakubserwatka-oktawave opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
bug 🐛 An issue with the system

Comments

@jakubserwatka-oktawave
Copy link

jakubserwatka-oktawave commented Jun 29, 2023

Describe the Bug

When creating asg backed capacity providers without image_id the creation will fail because default image is picked for x86.

Expected Behavior

Making image_id required and deleting data "ami"

or

Creating a mechanism to check instance architecture and pick correct ami for it

Steps to Reproduce

    container_insights_enabled      = false
    capacity_providers_fargate      = false
    capacity_providers_fargate_spot = false

    capacity_providers_ec2 = {
        "arm" = {
            instance_type = "t4g.small"

            max_size = 3
            min_size = 1
            target_capacity_utilization = 80

            subnet_ids    = [
                ...
            ]
            security_group_ids = [
               ...
            ]
        }
    }

Screenshots

No response

Environment

No response

Additional Context

No response

@jakubserwatka-oktawave jakubserwatka-oktawave added the bug 🐛 An issue with the system label Jun 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐛 An issue with the system
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant