You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now our data persistence layer is designed without concurrency. There isn't an opportunity for the caller to introduce it either because our functions are controlling the looping mechanisms to retrieve lists of data, or child datasets. With #212 the number of claims in an installation, or outputs in a result, etc is large enough that allowing concurrency, or just using it inside our library is necessary.
So let's decide on it and make the improvement after #212 is merged.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now our data persistence layer is designed without concurrency. There isn't an opportunity for the caller to introduce it either because our functions are controlling the looping mechanisms to retrieve lists of data, or child datasets. With #212 the number of claims in an installation, or outputs in a result, etc is large enough that allowing concurrency, or just using it inside our library is necessary.
So let's decide on it and make the improvement after #212 is merged.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: