Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: update README #39481

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2019
Merged

build: update README #39481

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2019

Conversation

knz
Copy link
Contributor

@knz knz commented Aug 9, 2019

Release note: None

Release note: None
@knz knz requested review from dt and ajwerner August 9, 2019 08:21
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@knz knz added the A-docs label Aug 9, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@ajwerner ajwerner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @dt)

@knz
Copy link
Contributor Author

knz commented Aug 13, 2019

TFYR!

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Aug 13, 2019

Build failed (retrying...)

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Aug 13, 2019

Canceled (will resume)

craig bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2019
39481: build: update README r=knz a=knz

Release note: None

39611: storage: rework AdminChangeReplicas for atomic membership changes r=nvanbenschoten a=tbg

Following the plan laid out in #39485, this adds API support for
general replication changes to `AdminChangeReplicasRequest`.

`(*DB).AtomicChangeReplicas` will now accept an arbitrary set
of additions/removals, though only on paper - the changes will
be executed individually.

The compatibility story is straightforward since this request is never
persisted. We simply populate both the deprecated and the new field (and
it isn't safe to emit "mixed" changes until all nodes run 19.2 and it's
not worth plumbing a setting around), and in 20.1 we remove the old
fields.  A maybe-snag is that as a result, there are a few months left
in this release in which folks may accidentally mix additions and
removals in a replica change without proper version gating. This wasn't
deemed very likely; to mitigate we could add in-memory state on the
request that fires a panic whenever the changeType changes.

Release note: None

Co-authored-by: Raphael 'kena' Poss <knz@cockroachlabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Schottdorf <tobias.schottdorf@gmail.com>
@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Aug 13, 2019

Build succeeded

@craig craig bot merged commit 8517f89 into cockroachdb:master Aug 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants