Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade ESLint to v9 #334

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024
Merged

Upgrade ESLint to v9 #334

merged 28 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

lorisleiva
Copy link
Member

@lorisleiva lorisleiva commented Nov 28, 2024

This PR upgrades ESLint and all dependencies that revolves around it to the latest available version.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 28, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: e53e821

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 15 packages
Name Type
@codama/nodes-from-anchor Patch
@codama/renderers-js-umi Patch
@codama/dynamic-parsers Patch
@codama/dynamic-codecs Patch
@codama/renderers-rust Patch
@codama/visitors-core Patch
@codama/renderers-js Patch
@codama/visitors Patch
@codama/errors Patch
@codama/renderers Patch
@codama/renderers-core Patch
@codama/validators Patch
codama Patch
@codama/nodes Patch
@codama/node-types Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@lorisleiva lorisleiva marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2024 14:48
Copy link
Contributor

@mcintyre94 mcintyre94 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@lorisleiva lorisleiva merged commit 2622727 into main Nov 28, 2024
4 checks passed
@lorisleiva lorisleiva deleted the loris/upgrade-eslint-9 branch November 28, 2024 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants