Issue is high quality, but not accepted
This finding falls outside the contest scope as delineated in the contest README
Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (25%)
Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%)
Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (75%)
Highest quality submission among a set of duplicates
Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
Further information is requested
Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix)
AI based primary recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
AI based duplicate group recommendation
satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
This submission will be included/highlighted in the audit report
Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")