Appeals process, v1 #155
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
It's a very interesting and impactful decision. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Considering what's at stake, it's no surprise that individual interests on all sides have emerged pretty strongly. Thanks! Edit: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@CloudEllie For research purposes, we at Kleros are keen to see if our decentralized jury-based court can produce substantiated rulings that are competitive in thoroughness and fairness to the appellate process described above. We are thinking to open a Kleros court case in parallel to an appeal case on C4 to compare the results, but we should preferably do it at the same time or before the C4 appellate court starts sharing their findings and reasoning publicly. Are there perhaps appeals that are about to be brought up in the coming weeks that we could take a look at? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Background
During post-judging QA for the recent UniStaker Infrastructure audit:
Given the intense debate among these experts in the Code4rena community, we deemed it appropriate to assemble an Appellate Court (Appeal Committee) to consider the arguments presented.
How appeals work
Per the Supreme Court’s recommendation:
Additions beyond initial recommendations
Appeal process
What’s next
A note of appreciation
…to everyone engaged in these debates. From our docs:
This community consistently inspires us through your collective commitment to fair process, collaboration, and openness to dissenting opinions. In particular,
0xthecoder
, who judged the audit, deserves our appreciation for his unwavering commitment to a fair and thoroughly-considered verdict, and his grace under pressure.Deep thanks to everyone who has contributed to this important iteration to C4’s judging processes.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions