Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Invitation audits should take into account Gas auditors #140

Open
c3phas opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Invitation audits should take into account Gas auditors #140

c3phas opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@c3phas
Copy link

c3phas commented Jan 17, 2024

For invitation audits we usually rsvp and usually highly ranked people will get the chance,this is great for HM AND QA as most highly ranked people usually produce the best reports for those.
However, gas audits are entirely different, unless someone focuses on doing gas audits they might not be giving the best value. I suggest we appoint someone to solely focus on the gas part or the long method have an rsvp model for the gas part,1 or 2 people should be good enough.

For most gas auditors, they would not be ranking so high in the leader board thus even if they rsvp with the current model chances are they wont get it.

@thenua3bhai
Copy link

Hi @sockdrawermoney What is happening in this discussion ? Imo c3phas is right invitation audits gas part should be based on previous 90 days gas results of wardens to catch better gas reports in invitational audits also. Others HMs and QA is fine as now.
Please tell us your thoughts also about this. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants