Uniques as partial credit

[dmvt]

Occasionally we encounter issues that are not up to the quality standards of C4 but are accurate high or medium risk uniques. I believe that as judges we need the ability to mark these issues as partial credit in the interest of fairness to wardens who do put in the effort to clearly and concisely describe their issues and impact.

[MarioPoneder]

I support this, since we are often "forced" to select a low-quality submission for report as there are no better options available. Same goes for duplicating low-effort submissions (no PoC, etc.) with full credit only because they correctly identify the core issue and impact.
Furthermore, this seems to be in line with our current submission guidelines:

As a professional audit platform, Code4rena's bar for a satisfactory submission is that it is as good as one might find in a professional audit report.

[bytes032]

@dmvt This is related to solo findings that are partials, is that correct?