-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Setup gatsby-starter-plone #19
Comments
@ajayns Have you been able to think about this? I assume the current test project should work pretty well as a standalone repository with yarn link. |
@datakurre yes, I'm testing the plugin out myself along with @cekk (who's been working on it with actual Plone sites) to make sure everything works fine before we move into using it for the starter. (ref: #133 ) |
Okay so since, we're not having much issues right now, I think we're good to move on to the starter. So moving step by step, I think the following has to be done first:
If anything else in particular that needs to be done and I missed, do mention. I'm also looking for other starters to take as reference |
Yes. Our current test project is based on gatsby starter, so you could copy stuff from there.
…On 19 Jul 2018, 12.56 +0300, Ajay NS ***@***.***>, wrote:
Okay so since, we're not having much issues right now, I think we're good to move on to the starter. So moving step by step, I think the following has to be done first:
• Clone gatsby starter
• Setup Prettier
• Add gatsby-source-plone and basic working
If anything else in particular that needs to be done and I missed, do mention. I'm also looking for other starters to take as reference
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
I'll need to create a new repo for this yes? |
@ajayns I assume that's the current practice for starters. |
Yep |
https://github.com/collective/gatsby-starter-plone I've created a new repo here |
Has been set up well enough to close this. |
We're using gatsby-starter-default for testing, but since according to my proposal I'll be working making it a full example, wouldn't it be a good idea to start it up now by:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: