-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rebuild for protobuf423 #137
Rebuild for protobuf423 #137
Conversation
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
This one pins tighter than #136, but will need to wait for the same reasons as that PR |
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.05.27.05.40.12
66ae1f3
to
24f5f00
Compare
@coryan @dbolduc
On linux we get something else (probably unrelated to the above as it also appears in native compilation for x64):
|
That seems like a bug upstream. We never cross-compile and have hard-coded The patch upstream may need to be more complicated because
Evidently we still need to skip that library. I thought this would have prevented the problem: But evidently it does not work. There is a fix upstream in Protobuf, but it did not make it to the 23.1 release: |
Filed googleapis/google-cloud-cpp#11779 to fix the cross-compilation problems in |
While I think the variable That said, you've been exemplary in upstreaming changes that are necessary for the feedstock, and I'm very grateful you've already tackled this in googleapis/google-cloud-cpp#11782 - thanks a lot!
Didn't make it into 23.2 either. Perhaps you need to ask for it to be backported? In the meantime, that means we'd just have to skip |
Thanks for saying that. Part of my job is to make these libraries easy to package. We cannot create or maintain packages for all the different packaging systems out there, but we can at least make the work easy (or easier) for the package maintainers.
Yes. Sorry. I lost track of what "Protobuf latest" was.
I see you did that, thanks.
Yes. Looks that way.
Yes, I believe those are fine now. We have builds on macOS and Windows to test that. |
So with protocolbuffers/protobuf#12987 backported to |
This PR has been triggered in an effort to update protobuf423.
Notes and instructions for merging this PR:
Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.
Closes #136
If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the
bot-rerun
label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase@conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot
in a PR comment to have theconda-forge-admin
add it for you.This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/5097913761, please use this URL for debugging.