Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add run_constrained for libprotobuf-python-headers #177

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

xhochy
Copy link
Member

@xhochy xhochy commented Aug 23, 2023

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

@xhochy xhochy marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2023 14:07
@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@xhochy
Copy link
Member Author

xhochy commented Aug 23, 2023

I will mark build 3 as broken 😞

Copy link

@varlackc varlackc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is an old pull request for version 24.0, just curious to know how we should address it?

#169

@xhochy
Copy link
Member Author

xhochy commented Aug 23, 2023

#169 should be rebased on top of this.

@xhochy xhochy merged commit 1e2fe68 into conda-forge:main Aug 23, 2023
@xhochy xhochy deleted the pyheader-run_constrained branch August 23, 2023 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants