Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify exact license in repo and packages #45

Closed
palmskog opened this issue Jul 25, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #46
Closed

Clarify exact license in repo and packages #45

palmskog opened this issue Jul 25, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #46

Comments

@palmskog
Copy link
Member

We are trying to use SPDX identifiers everywhere for licenses, which does not include "LGPL-2.1" - the possibilities are either LGPL-2.1-only or LGPL-2.1-or-later. This project should clarify in its README.md (and meta.yml) which one it is.

From 02fd659 it seems the intent was to follow Coq's license, which is LGPL-2.1-only.
@erikmd
Copy link
Member

erikmd commented Jul 26, 2020

Related: coq/opam#1346

@erikmd erikmd mentioned this issue Jul 26, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Update license identifier and other metadata validsdp/bignums
2 participants
@palmskog @erikmd