Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support AMD SEV-SNP instances on GCP #3556

Open
HuijingHei opened this issue Aug 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Support AMD SEV-SNP instances on GCP #3556

HuijingHei opened this issue Aug 14, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@HuijingHei
Copy link
Member

Feature Request

Currently we can create AMD SEV type confidential instances and run tests on GCP using kola. See
#3474

We should also support AMD SEV-SNP type confidential instances on GCP. See #3547

Desired Feature

  • To create instances with AMD SEV, add option --gcp-confidential-type sev

  • To create instances with AMD SEV-SNP, add option --gcp-confidential-type sev-snp

Other Information

To create instances with AMD SEV-SNP ,

  • For gcloud command, should add alpha and --confidential-compute-type=SEV_SNP, like this:
gcloud alpha compute instances create example-instance \
  --confidential-compute-type=SEV_SNP \
...
  • For api should contain confidentialInstanceType,
...
  "confidentialInstanceConfig": {
    "confidentialInstanceType": "SEV_SNP"
 }

The current api v1 is not yet supported for confidentialInstanceType , but in api alpha, should wait until it includes into v1.

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member

@HuijingHei do we know if this statement is still the case today?

The current api v1 is not yet supported for confidentialInstanceType , but in api alpha, should wait until it includes into v1.

@HuijingHei
Copy link
Member Author

@HuijingHei do we know if this statement is still the case today?

The current api v1 is not yet supported for confidentialInstanceType , but in api alpha, should wait until it includes into v1.

Yes, no confidentialInstanceType in latest v1, but in v0.alpha, I have no idea if there is any plan to be included in v1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants