Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does ME >= 12 ignore the HAP bit? #304

Open
owlshrimp opened this issue Oct 24, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Does ME >= 12 ignore the HAP bit? #304

owlshrimp opened this issue Oct 24, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@owlshrimp
Copy link

Was reading https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NRXqXcLBp5pFkHiJbrLdv3Spqh1Hu086HYkKrgKjeDQ/edit#

They note that on ME version >= 12, it ignores the HAP bit.

@dt-zero
Copy link

dt-zero commented Oct 25, 2019

This is not true. I have successfully disabled Intel ME 12 using the High Assurance Platform bit. It's position changed on the latest platforms compared to where it used to be located inside the PCH strap region. See my PR #282

@Espionage724
Copy link

This is not true. I have successfully disabled Intel ME 12 using the High Assurance Platform bit. It's position changed on the latest platforms compared to where it used to be located inside the PCH strap region. See my PR #282

Thanks a lot for this PR! I have a Acer Predator Helios 300 laptop with Coffee Lake and ME 12. I used the PR .py, and successfully disabled the HAP bit on my dumped BIOS.

Laptop boots fine, and I confirmed ME disabled from a few sources (BIOS no longer presents a TPM option, no HECI PCI device present in lspci, and intelmetool can't find ME PCI device anymore)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants