Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CometMock specific functionality: Advancing Time, Downtime & Advancing Blocks #1006

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
Tracked by #932
p-offtermatt opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1017
Closed
2 of 3 tasks
Tracked by #932
Assignees

Comments

@p-offtermatt
Copy link
Contributor

p-offtermatt commented Jun 12, 2023

Problem

CometMock should eventually provide specific functionality like advancing time, choosing signers and proposers,
running empty blocks, etc.
These custom endpoints should eventually be used in our e2e tests if we need more advanced testing behaviour.

This issue deals with three functionalities:

  • Advancing Time
  • Advancing Blocks
  • Causing downtime

Closing criteria

The end-to-end tests make use of CometMocks custom endpoints to advance time, advance blocks, and invoke downtime.

Related issues

#938 the issue for implementing this functionality in CometMock

@p-offtermatt p-offtermatt changed the title Add CometMock specific functionality: Downtime & Advancing Blocks Add CometMock specific functionality: Advancing Time, Downtime & Advancing Blocks Jun 12, 2023
@p-offtermatt p-offtermatt moved this from 🩹 Triage to 🏗 In progress in Cosmos Hub Jun 12, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🩹 Triage in Cosmos Hub Jun 12, 2023
@p-offtermatt p-offtermatt self-assigned this Jun 12, 2023
@p-offtermatt p-offtermatt moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Cosmos Hub Jun 16, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in Cosmos Hub Jun 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant