-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question: rly tx link with custom client trusting periods for each client #1357
Comments
Hi @ashishchandr70, If you don't use the So sounds like this is the answer you're looking for... just don't use that flag. If you do use the flag, If you want separate custom trusting periods per client, you're correct, you'll need to run |
Thanks @boojamya. The issue with the 85% of unbonding time is that most of the chains we are integrating with (Axelar, Osmosis) require the I was hoping that this request can be considered for a future PR i.e. adding a separate |
Agree, this would be a great addition. |
Closed via: #1365 |
Hi,
When creating the client/connection/channel in one go, I use
rly tx link ...
. Now, this command does support the--client-tp
flag so I use it like so:rly tx link sagaxl --client-tp 403200s --override --src-port transfer --dst-port transfer --order unordered --version ics20-1
This does create the client and the connection and channel but the
trusting_period
for both clients is set to the same value, which is not often the case as different chains can require differenttrusting_period
values based on their chain'sunbonding_period
This is one of the client's config after the above command completes successfully:
Most chains require that you set the
trusting_period
to 2/3 of theunbonding_period
.Am I using the command incorrectly or should there be an option to set this for
chain_1
andchain_2
separately in therly tx link
command?I know I can do this separately by
rly tx client
for each chain separately but if we haverly tx link
, it should not be too much work to introduce a flag for both chains separately.Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: