You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recognize that we are currently using the crate-python driver together with the BatchSizeAutomator in order to balance throughput saturation vs. overload situations.
On this matter, I would also like to point out asyncpg's upcoming MagicStack/asyncpg#295, which improves executemany() to batch args for performance. It will probably be available with asyncpg>=0.22.0. Thanks to @mfussenegger for sharing this.
With kind regards,
Andreas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Josh,
I recognize that we are currently using the
crate-python
driver together with theBatchSizeAutomator
in order to balance throughput saturation vs. overload situations.https://github.com/crate/ts-data-generator/blob/9c64608d2cd9618e9d3b8d9be387c199b1fe4a4e/requirements.txt#L3
https://github.com/crate/ts-data-generator/blob/67330181e262d069f09e27bc64eb18951384b2f4/src/data_generator/data_generator.py#L60-L62
On this matter, I would also like to point out
asyncpg
's upcoming MagicStack/asyncpg#295, which improvesexecutemany()
to batch args for performance. It will probably be available withasyncpg>=0.22.0
. Thanks to @mfussenegger for sharing this.With kind regards,
Andreas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: