Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Admins should be able to add a new source when editing documents #71

Open
jameslaneconkling opened this issue May 24, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@jameslaneconkling
Copy link
Member

Currently, it's only possible to select source from a dropdown of existing sources. It should also be possible to input a new source.

@markmcdonald51
Copy link
Contributor

done.

@jameslaneconkling
Copy link
Member Author

Hey James, I can add this in but is there any real data in this table in the source field? Going to wait till you get back to me to do this operation.

@markmcdonald51 Yeah, there's all of these sources that were created in the scrape. This is good, as it means that the same source won't have variants in spelling. But if they want to create a report from a source that hasn't yet been defined in the source table, there's no way to do this, since the source form isn't exposed to them yet.

@jameslaneconkling
Copy link
Member Author

@markmcdonald51 wait, unless I'm mistaken, it looks like you added this to deposits, not documents. In short:

  • the source field for deposits should be free text (no association, and no need for the table deposit sources)
  • the source field for documents is already an association with the source table. This is good, but when adding new documents, admins can only choose from existing sources, they can't create a new source if necessary. See below screenshot.

screenshot 2015-06-03 18 35 44

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants