Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Task] Search/filters in Recordings tables #414

Closed
Tracked by #440
andrewazores opened this issue Apr 25, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #486
Closed
Tracked by #440

[Task] Search/filters in Recordings tables #414

andrewazores opened this issue Apr 25, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #486
Assignees
Labels
feat New feature or request needs-documentation

Comments

@andrewazores
Copy link
Member

The Active/Archived recordings tables should be searchable/filterable by the recording's name, state, and labels. Before/after a datetime would also be nice.

@jan-law jan-law self-assigned this May 16, 2022
@andrewazores andrewazores moved this to In Progress in 2.2.0 Release May 17, 2022
@andrewazores andrewazores changed the title Search/filters in Recordings tables [Story] Search/filters in Recordings tables May 17, 2022
@andrewazores andrewazores changed the title [Story] Search/filters in Recordings tables [Task] Search/filters in Recordings tables May 17, 2022
@andrewazores
Copy link
Member Author

@jan-law I filed a second issue, #441, that I think better encapsulates the discussion we had on #428 on this topic. I think #441 and this one are very complementary (so they're Tasks grouped in a Story now), but it'd be easier to develop and review these as two separate PRs I think.

@andrewazores andrewazores added feat New feature or request and removed enhancement labels Jun 6, 2022
Repository owner moved this from In Progress to Done in 2.2.0 Release Jul 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat New feature or request needs-documentation
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants