Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate "rose suite-run" functionality into cylc. #1885

Closed
3 of 4 tasks
hjoliver opened this issue Jun 12, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed
3 of 4 tasks

Migrate "rose suite-run" functionality into cylc. #1885

hjoliver opened this issue Jun 12, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@hjoliver
Copy link
Member

hjoliver commented Jun 12, 2016

Cylc still uses its original simplistic run-in-place model: the user registers a suite source location and cylc loads it from that location (repeatedly, for reruns, restarts, reloads), This can be a problem if changes need to be made while the suite is running: users have to manage the distinction between source and live/running suite definitions manually, or else be very careful about working in-place.

rose suite-run was created largely to get around the limitations of this model by automatically separating source and installed suites, and we agreed some time ago to move its main funcitionality over to cylc in due course.

Accordingly, the new cylc suite-run command (see #1030) should:

Ideally the new cylc suite-run command should also have the ability to install files from external locations, because almost any suite needs that, but this may need some discussion because it is somewhat tied to rose suite and app configuration functionality, which cylc won't be taking.

@hjoliver
Copy link
Member Author

hjoliver commented Jun 19, 2016

[meeting] we agreed:

  • source dir installation
  • start suite on a pool server
  • update changes from source

Not clear yet, possibly later:

  • installation of external files

Need to consider the issues raised in #1720

@arjclark
Copy link
Contributor

See metomi/rose#1536

@wxtim
Copy link
Member

wxtim commented Jul 31, 2019

I have started to discuss plans for this meta-ticket in cylc-admin...

@oliver-sanders
Copy link
Member

oliver-sanders commented Nov 12, 2020

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants