Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bundled Node Version 8.2 is too old #2253

Closed
Mikuu opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 7 comments · Fixed by #4720
Closed

Bundled Node Version 8.2 is too old #2253

Mikuu opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 7 comments · Fixed by #4720
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers type: chore Work is required w/ no deliverable to end user

Comments

@Mikuu
Copy link

Mikuu commented Aug 1, 2018

Any plan to upgrade the Cypress bundled node version to latest v8.11? The currently bundled version 8.2 is too old to prevent us easily create more useful plugins.

@bahmutov
Copy link
Contributor

bahmutov commented Aug 1, 2018 via email

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane added good first issue Good for newcomers type: chore Work is required w/ no deliverable to end user stage: ready for work The issue is reproducible and in scope labels Aug 1, 2018
@brian-mann
Copy link
Member

The bundled version of node comes from Electron. There is a newer update out, but we've been waiting for 3.0.0 to drop, which will upgrade Chromium and other things that are blockers for us on other features.

There's no way to upgrade node independently of that.

@mhelvens
Copy link

Eagerly waiting for this, especially now that cy.task is a thing.

Is there a workaround that would let me import a module that uses object spread notation? For example, can I use my own Node version, rather than the bundled one, or can I make Cypress pass the --harmony flag to Node 8.2?

@Jaemu
Copy link

Jaemu commented Oct 1, 2018

3.0.0 dropped two weeks ago, currently on 3.0.2 according to https://electronjs.org/releases

Is someone actively working on the electron upgrade?

@jennifer-shehane
Copy link
Member

@Jaemu Yes. #3568

@cypress-bot cypress-bot bot added stage: needs review The PR code is done & tested, needs review and removed stage: work in progress labels Sep 12, 2019
@cypress-bot cypress-bot bot added stage: pending release and removed stage: needs review The PR code is done & tested, needs review labels Sep 24, 2019
@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented Sep 24, 2019

The code for this is done in cypress-io/cypress#4720, but has yet to be released.
We'll update this issue and reference the changelog when it's released.

@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented Oct 23, 2019

Released in 3.5.0.

@cypress-io cypress-io locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2020
@cypress-io cypress-io deleted a comment from cypress-bot bot Jan 3, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers type: chore Work is required w/ no deliverable to end user
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants