You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dynamic range for FACS (sfig 4) misleading because it's smeared by lognormal noise (PCR) relative to UMI.
But numbers of diff exp genes between two similar populations is still of interest, may be quantifiable. Interesting to compare sharpness (for highly expressed w/ UMI) vs number (b/c lowly expressed show up in FACS).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dynamic range for FACS (sfig 4) misleading because it's smeared by lognormal noise (PCR) relative to UMI.
But numbers of diff exp genes between two similar populations is still of interest, may be quantifiable. Interesting to compare sharpness (for highly expressed w/ UMI) vs number (b/c lowly expressed show up in FACS).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: