Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sourcePublisher required or recommended #221

Closed
mattgarrish opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #269
Closed

sourcePublisher required or recommended #221

mattgarrish opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #269
Labels
eBraille specification Issue for the ebraille 1.0 specification Topic - metadata Issue with the package document metadata

Comments

@mattgarrish
Copy link
Contributor

Looking at the required metadata, having sourcePublisher in the list requires that the ebraille publication come from another source. Is there no expectation that the format could be used to create braille-original works?

If there is that possibility, then sourcePublisher should only be recommended as it's the one piece of required metadata that isn't about describing the ebraille publication itself.

@mattgarrish mattgarrish added the Topic - metadata Issue with the package document metadata label Jul 8, 2024
@mattgarrish mattgarrish added the eBraille specification Issue for the ebraille 1.0 specification label Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
eBraille specification Issue for the ebraille 1.0 specification Topic - metadata Issue with the package document metadata
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant