Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve head to head section #78

Open
danbugs opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Improve head to head section #78

danbugs opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
feature new feature

Comments

@danbugs
Copy link
Owner

danbugs commented Jan 4, 2024

Describe the solution you'd like
Currently, the head-to-head section is very basic. There's tons of improvements that could be made to it, like (these are listed in order or priority):
(1) rn, we are querying based on the opponent_tag_with_prefix - this is terrible because if someone does just as much as change their prefix, they will show up as a different player in the head-to-head. We should query based on ID - I don't remember specifically why I didn't do that in the past, but it might have been something related to entrant IDs vs. actual user IDs. Perhaps, we can use game data (which does have IDs) to make that better by correlating it back to the set.
(2) display list of sets they've played.
(3) visual - make it look nicer.
(4) allow clicking on the opponent to view their profile (would be easy if we had opponent IDs).

Other than that, it could be cool to make displays for smt like: "your bracket demon" (i.e., whoever beats you the most), "you are a bracket demon to" (i.e., whoever you beat the most), etc.

Additional context
n/a

@danbugs danbugs added the feature new feature label Jan 4, 2024
@danbugs danbugs added this to the Post MVP milestone Jan 4, 2024
@danbugs danbugs self-assigned this Jan 4, 2024
@danbugs danbugs removed this from the Post MVP milestone Feb 22, 2024
@danbugs danbugs removed their assignment Feb 23, 2024
@CERLgit
Copy link
Contributor

CERLgit commented Mar 12, 2024

Going to look into this one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants