Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft version timestamps not updated when embargoed assets were moved #2002

Open
jwodder opened this issue Aug 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Draft version timestamps not updated when embargoed assets were moved #2002

jwodder opened this issue Aug 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@jwodder
Copy link
Member

jwodder commented Aug 12, 2024

It appears that, on or around April 29, embargoed asset blobs were moved from the dandiarchive-embargo bucket to the dandiarchive bucket. This was accompanied by updates to the assets' contentUrl metadata, and the assets' modified properties were updated at that time, but the modified properties of the respective Dandisets' draft versions were not updated, and backups2datalad does not like this.

For a specific example, the embargoed Dandiset 000770 contains an asset sub-Elgar/sub-Elgar_ses-2022-06-04_ecephys.nwb with a modified property of 2024-04-29T19:35:05.558024Z, yet the modified property for 000770/draft is still 2024-04-09T19:15:02.126137Z.

@jjnesbitt
Copy link
Member

So it seems this is mainly a retroactive issue? That is, we should update these respective versions to reflect the last modified time of those assets, but it's not a systematic issue going forward? Seems like it's just a side effect of the embargo re-design data migration.

@jwodder
Copy link
Member Author

jwodder commented Aug 16, 2024

@jjnesbitt Yes, that sounds correct.

@jjnesbitt
Copy link
Member

@jwodder I believe I've addressed the issue. Can you verify this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants