You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It appears that, on or around April 29, embargoed asset blobs were moved from the dandiarchive-embargo bucket to the dandiarchive bucket. This was accompanied by updates to the assets' contentUrl metadata, and the assets' modified properties were updated at that time, but the modified properties of the respective Dandisets' draft versions were not updated, and backups2datalad does not like this.
For a specific example, the embargoed Dandiset 000770 contains an asset sub-Elgar/sub-Elgar_ses-2022-06-04_ecephys.nwb with a modified property of 2024-04-29T19:35:05.558024Z, yet the modified property for 000770/draft is still 2024-04-09T19:15:02.126137Z.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So it seems this is mainly a retroactive issue? That is, we should update these respective versions to reflect the last modified time of those assets, but it's not a systematic issue going forward? Seems like it's just a side effect of the embargo re-design data migration.
It appears that, on or around April 29, embargoed asset blobs were moved from the
dandiarchive-embargo
bucket to thedandiarchive
bucket. This was accompanied by updates to the assets'contentUrl
metadata, and the assets'modified
properties were updated at that time, but themodified
properties of the respective Dandisets'draft
versions were not updated, andbackups2datalad
does not like this.For a specific example, the embargoed Dandiset 000770 contains an asset
sub-Elgar/sub-Elgar_ses-2022-06-04_ecephys.nwb
with amodified
property of2024-04-29T19:35:05.558024Z
, yet themodified
property for 000770/draft is still2024-04-09T19:15:02.126137Z
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: