Partial classes

[DartBot]

This issue was originally filed by luciandog...@ymail.com

---

Please implement partial classes in Dart.

[DartBot]

This comment was originally written by adrian.avil...@gmail.com

---

You can already split classes in Dart with part files, that would be the equivalent.

[dgrove]

Set owner to @gbracha.
Removed Type-Defect label.
Added Type-Enhancement, Area-Language, Triaged labels.

[gbracha]

We've discussed this on the mailing list. You can use parts for large libraries. You can define multiple mixins and combine them. We do not need this extra sugar.

---

Added AsDesigned label.

[kevmoo]

Link to misc@ discussion Jan 2013 - https://groups.google.com/a/dartlang.org/d/topic/misc/KTuJ_Z6O1oQ/discussion

Mixins are great to encourage reuse, but the there are arguments for partial classes that cannot be covered by mixins: generating code that includes constructors, for instance.

For example:

// mycode.dart
library mycode;

part 'mycode.g.dart';

class Person {
  String firstName, lastName;
}

// mycode.g.dart
part of mycode;

partial class Person {
  Person.fromJson(json) =>
    new Person()
      ..firstName = json['firstName']
      ..lastName = json['lastName'];

  toJson() => {'firstName': firstName, 'lastName': lastName};
}

---

Added Triaged label.

[gbracha]

Added Accepted label.

[DartBot]

This comment was originally written by hangglide...@gmail.com

---

We donot need this extra sugar.

• 1

[MihaMarkic]

Not being able to extend classes through partial implementation files is PITA and makes some scenarios really hard to achieve when it comes to autogenerated code. This is even more important to flutter because it doesn't support reflection (or whatever it's called in dart world) and you have either write or autogenerate code (i.e. json (de)serialization).
Sadly this issue isn't getting any love for more than 3 years.

[eernstg]

You might want to check out several recent related issues: #40, #41, #42, #177, #309.

Granted, C# style partial classes are not equivalent to any of these, but they are concerned with mechanisms for extending existing classes.

[MihaMarkic]

@eernstg Thanks for the info, hopefully they will come out with something comparably useful.

[mateusfccp]

Now this is a duplicate of #252.

[lrhn]

It is, and with that comment, there is a link from #252 to here, so let's close this issue.