We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As part of the upgrade to Dart language and the pub.dev website, I'm now getting lesser scores for my package.
The reason for the lower scores are health suggestions informing a linter issue as follows:
Omit type annotations for local variables
This is an issue at multiple lines.
And I don't want to remove type annotations for local variables for readability and testing purposes.
I've ignored the rule using analysis_options.yaml, but the pub.dev still uses the standard linting rules.
analysis_options.yaml
Can anyone provide a reason why Dart has added this rule to the linter? What are the benefits to this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Cf. googlearchive/pedantic#45.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Since the issue was opened, we have limited the amount of lint penalty, and reverted to use pedantic 1.8.0.
No branches or pull requests
As part of the upgrade to Dart language and the pub.dev website, I'm now getting lesser scores for my package.
The reason for the lower scores are health suggestions informing a linter issue as follows:
This is an issue at multiple lines.
And I don't want to remove type annotations for local variables for readability and testing purposes.
I've ignored the rule using
analysis_options.yaml
, but the pub.dev still uses the standard linting rules.Can anyone provide a reason why Dart has added this rule to the linter? What are the benefits to this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: