Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: get_tableinfos_by_ids() #16503

Merged

Conversation

drmingdrmer
Copy link
Member

@drmingdrmer drmingdrmer commented Sep 24, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

refactor: get_tableinfos_by_ids()

Tests

  • Unit Test
  • Logic Test
  • Benchmark Test
  • No Test - Explain why

Type of change

  • Refactoring

Related Issues


This change is Reviewable

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr-refactor this PR changes the code base without new features or bugfix label Sep 24, 2024
@drmingdrmer drmingdrmer force-pushed the 157-get_tableinfos_by_ids branch 2 times, most recently from 6c94bca to 4bc5660 Compare September 24, 2024 04:21
@drmingdrmer drmingdrmer marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2024 04:52
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 24, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Sep 24, 2024
@drmingdrmer drmingdrmer force-pushed the 157-get_tableinfos_by_ids branch from 4bc5660 to 351de96 Compare September 24, 2024 08:03
@drmingdrmer drmingdrmer merged commit 0c4b47e into databendlabs:main Sep 24, 2024
71 of 72 checks passed
@drmingdrmer drmingdrmer deleted the 157-get_tableinfos_by_ids branch September 24, 2024 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer pr-refactor this PR changes the code base without new features or bugfix size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants