Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CT-2640] To-do: Investigate if RuntimeConfig.from_args can be optimized to avoid reading from disk if profile and project are passed in. #7787

Open
Tracked by #7301
aranke opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
tech_debt Behind-the-scenes changes, with little direct impact on end-user functionality

Comments

@aranke
Copy link
Member

aranke commented Jun 5, 2023

To-do: Investigate if RuntimeConfig.from_args can be optimized to avoid reading from disk if profile and project are passed in.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title To-do: Investigate if RuntimeConfig.from_args can be optimized to avoid reading from disk if profile and project are passed in. [CT-2640] To-do: Investigate if RuntimeConfig.from_args can be optimized to avoid reading from disk if profile and project are passed in. Jun 5, 2023
@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 added the tech_debt Behind-the-scenes changes, with little direct impact on end-user functionality label Jun 21, 2023
@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

Goal of investigation: Cleaner code, clearer inputs to a dbt invocation. Performance isn't primary concern/motivation.

@graciegoheen
Copy link
Contributor

Notes from technical refinement:

  • which should we do first to get things started? flags is generally first
  • we don't have a good place to store those dictionaries
  • is there a better way to totally refactor the way things start up

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tech_debt Behind-the-scenes changes, with little direct impact on end-user functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants