Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CT-3556] Define SavedQuery contract in dbt/artifacts #9386

Closed
1 task done
Tracked by #9099
MichelleArk opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9460
Closed
1 task done
Tracked by #9099

[CT-3556] Define SavedQuery contract in dbt/artifacts #9386

MichelleArk opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9460
Assignees

Comments

@MichelleArk
Copy link
Contributor

MichelleArk commented Jan 16, 2024

Housekeeping

  • I am a maintainer of dbt-core

Short description

As part of an effort to move any ArtifactMixin subclasses upstream of other core modules into the top -level dbt/artifacts directory, we need to move SavedQuery, which WritableManifest depends on.

Acceptance criteria

SavedQuery (and its necessary dependencies) are moved to a new dbt/artifacts directory. dbt/artifacts should have no additional dependencies on dbt.core except for from contracts.nodes which are actively being refactored.

SavedQuery should be split into data & functional interfaces, defined in dbt/artifacts in dbt/core respectively. Additionally, any inheritance hierarchy between concrete node classes should be flattened as part of this spike.

Should follow initial pattern set in #9379

Impact to Other Teams

N/A - should be a refactor.

Will backports be required?

nope

Context

No response

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Define SavedQuery contract in dbt/artifacts [CT-3556] Define SavedQuery contract in dbt/artifacts Jan 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants