Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Describe connecting to Snowflake via OAuth #2892

Closed
1 task done
dbeatty10 opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6435
Closed
1 task done

Describe connecting to Snowflake via OAuth #2892

dbeatty10 opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6435
Assignees
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: high Technical inaccuracy, missing/incorrect information, or broken links. Negatively affects workflows

Comments

@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/warehouse-setups/snowflake-setup#authentication-methods

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

Describe the OAuth method(s) for connecting to Snowflake.

Use this content for the crucial parameters.

BigQuery has an analogous OAuth option & instructions here which can be used for context and inspiration.

Additional information

Snowflake Admins will use instructions like this and this to setup this connection method.

But we want to cover how end users can configuration their connection in their dbt profiles.yml once their admin has set it up.

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear labels Feb 20, 2023
@amychen1776 amychen1776 added the priority: high Technical inaccuracy, missing/incorrect information, or broken links. Negatively affects workflows label Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: high Technical inaccuracy, missing/incorrect information, or broken links. Negatively affects workflows
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants