Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Crash log only contains SIGSEGV and /lib/libc.so.6 #81

Open
Saturnyn opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Crash log only contains SIGSEGV and /lib/libc.so.6 #81

Saturnyn opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@Saturnyn
Copy link

Hello,

I am using this lib to debug a crash that occurs randomly in an application which is running on a raspberry pi with a very barebones unix OS. The crash is very hard to reproduce consistently, the app can run for hours with no problems and will sometimes crash after a few minutes.

Here is the log I get after adding node-segfault-handler:

PID 386 received SIGSEGV for address: 0x3f5e2ca8
/usr/lib/node/prod/node_modules/segfault-handler/build/Release/segfault-handler.node(+0x1b2e)[0xb429bb2e]
/lib/libc.so.6(+0x2a300)[0xb6639300]

I was hoping it would point me in the direction of one of the native modules that the app is using, but the log turns out to be not very helpful ^^

I am a bit out of my depth here, and would appreciate it if someone could help me understand what is going on:

  • does this log completely rule out the native modules I am using as the source of the crashes ?
  • is the "libc.so.6" in the stack a clue for finding the cause of the crash, or is just a part of the segfault-handler logging mechanism ?
  • is there anything I can do to make this log a bit more verbose ?

Thanks

@Onixaz
Copy link

Onixaz commented Jul 5, 2022

Did you find a solution ? Same problem here

@Saturnyn
Copy link
Author

Saturnyn commented Jul 6, 2022

No, we still have the same problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants