eth: implement multi-balance contract for evm balance checks #2520
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
martonp
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2023
client/asset/eth/eth.go
Outdated
| if w.balances.m == nil { | ||
| w.balances.m = make(map[uint32]*cachedBalance) | ||
| } | ||
| // Check to see if wa already have one up-to-date |
JoeGruffins
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2023
buck54321
force-pushed
the
token-balances
branch
from
264a59e to
8fae180
Compare
peterzen
pushed a commit
to peterzen/dcrdex
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2023
…2520) * implement multi-wallet balance contract for eth and polygon
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contract
MultiBalanceV0has onepublic viewfunctionthat returns the balance for an account and for any number of tokens. Greatly reduces the request rate to providers.
Additionally implements a cache for balances, so repeated
Balancecalls don't hammer the provider between blocks.