-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New messages for pull rumors #1877
Conversation
Pull reviewers statsStats of the last 30 days for popstellar:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
great I would just suggest changing the name of the param to just state
"type": "object", | ||
"additionalProperties": false, | ||
"properties": { | ||
"rumor_state": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you could just write state, we already know it is a rumor_state with the method
Quality Gate passed for 'PoP - PoPCHA-Web-Client'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate passed for 'PoP - Be2-Scala'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate passed for 'PoP - Be1-Go'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate passed for 'PoP - Fe1-Web'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate passed for 'PoP - Fe2-Android'Issues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
all good for me now with the added answer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving blindly
To be able to use pull gossiping, we need new messages that will share the state of the received rumors per server.