CODEOWNERS

# Note: there seems to be a lot of contention about the usefulness of CODEOWNERS.
# We should make sure to have a discussion before making code owners more widespread, as it
# potentially causes a lot of extra noise for developers.
#
# See https://about.sourcegraph.com/blog/a-different-way-to-think-about-code-ownership/
# See https://bionic.fullstory.com/taming-github-codeowners-with-bots/

# We want to make sure any changes to workflows are closely monitored, as they may have non-obvious
# security implications.
#
# See https://securitylab.github.com/research/github-actions-preventing-pwn-requests/
/.github/workflows/ @devinrsmith @jcferretti @JamesXNelson @mofojed @rcaudy

/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md @chipkent @rcaudy
/CONTRIBUTING.md @chipkent @rcaudy
/LICENSE.md @chipkent @rcaudy
/NOTICE.md @chipkent @rcaudy
/README.md @chipkent @rcaudy @margaretkennedy
/RELEASE.md @devinrsmith @jcferretti @stanbrub
/TRIAGE.md @chipkent @rcaudy
/licenses @chipkent @rcaudy
/docker @devinrsmith @jcferretti @rcaudy
/engine/function/ @chipkent @kosak @rcaudy
/py @chipkent @jmao-denver @rcaudy
/R @chipkent @alexpeters1208 @rcaudy
*.proto @devinrsmith @nbauernfeind @niloc132 @rcaudy
*.gwt.xml @niloc132 @rcaudy @nbauernfeind