Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Chore(pt): slim uts for dpa1 #4244

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Chore(pt): slim uts for dpa1 #4244

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

iProzd
Copy link
Collaborator

@iProzd iProzd commented Oct 23, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Simplified test parameters and logic for the TestDPA1 class, reducing complexity in test cases.
    • Streamlined conditions for skipping tests based on specific parameters, enhancing test efficiency.

@iProzd iProzd requested review from njzjz and wanghan-iapcm October 23, 2024 09:52
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the TestDPA1 class within the source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py file. The modifications involve simplifying the parameters in the parameterized decorator and refining the logic in the is_meaningless_zero_attention_layer_tests method. Specifically, the number of options for certain parameters has been reduced, and the conditions for skipping tests have been streamlined, enhancing the clarity and efficiency of the test cases.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py Modified TestDPA1 class by reducing parameter options in parameterized decorator and simplifying logic in is_meaningless_zero_attention_layer_tests method.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • wanghan-iapcm
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c70f3b and 79a7a89.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@iProzd @njzjz
Update source/tests/consistent/descriptor/test_dpa1.py
9c70f3b 
Co-authored-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Duo <50307526+iProzd@users.noreply.github.com>
@njzjz njzjz linked an issue Oct 23, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Reduce test matrix #4177
Open
@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.22%. Comparing base (b8e57f2) to head (79a7a89).
Report is 6 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4244      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.57%   84.22%   -0.35%     
==========================================
  Files         547      547              
  Lines       51328    51328              
  Branches     3047     3048       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        43410    43233     -177     
- Misses       6970     7148     +178     
+ Partials      948      947       -1

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@iProzd iProzd requested a review from wanghan-iapcm October 23, 2024 14:20
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 23, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit c2d0560 Oct 23, 2024
60 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm approved these changes

@njzjz njzjz njzjz approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Python
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reduce test matrix
3 participants
@iProzd @njzjz @wanghan-iapcm