-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JIT implementation for SHA instructions #3
Conversation
src/coreclr/jit/instrsxarch.h
Outdated
@@ -621,6 +621,17 @@ INST3(lzcnt, "lzcnt", IUM_WR, BAD_CODE, BAD_CODE, | |||
// POPCNT | |||
INST3(popcnt, "popcnt", IUM_WR, BAD_CODE, BAD_CODE, SSEFLT(0xB8), Resets_OF | Resets_SF | Writes_ZF | Resets_AF | Resets_PF | Resets_CF ) | |||
|
|||
// SHA1 | |||
INST3(sha1rnds4, "sha1rnds4", IUM_WR, BAD_CODE, BAD_CODE, 0xcc, Undefined_OF | Undefined_SF | Writes_ZF | Undefined_AF | Undefined_PF | Writes_CF ) | |||
INST2(sha1nexte, "sha1nexte", IUM_WR, BAD_CODE, 0xc8, Undefined_OF | Undefined_SF | Writes_ZF | Undefined_AF | Undefined_PF | Writes_CF ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious: how did you get that 0xc8
for sha1nexte
for example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious: how did it get that
0xc8
forsha1nexte
for example?
I looked at the opcode table in the kernel :D
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/c9e6606c7fe92b50a02ce51dda82586ebdf99b48/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt#L790
* Initial implementation for contract customization fix build errors Move converter rooting to DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver so that it can be used standalone Fix ConfigurationList.IsReadOnly Minor refactorings (#1) * Makes the following changes: * Move singleton initialization for DefaultTypeInfoResolver behind a static property. * Consolidate JsonSerializerContext & IJsonTypeInfoResolver values to a single field. * Move reflection fallback logic away from JsonSerializerContext and into JsonSerializerOptions * Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonSerializerOptions.cs * remove testing of removed field Simplify the JsonTypeInfo.CreateObject implemenetation (#2) * Simplify the JsonTypeInfo.CreateObject implemenetation * Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/Metadata/JsonTypeInfoOfT.cs * Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/Metadata/JsonTypeInfoOfT.cs Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Wicher <mordotymoja@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Wicher <mordotymoja@gmail.com> Tests and fixes for JsonTypeInfoKind.None TypeInfo type mismatch tests Allow setting NumberHandling on JsonTypeInfoKind.None test resolver returning wrong type of options JsonTypeInfo/JsonPropertyInfo mutability tests rename test file Move default converter rooting responsibility behind DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver (#3) * Move default converter rooting responsibility behind DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver * address feedback Add simple test for using JsonTypeInfo<T> with APIs directly taking it fix and tests for untyped/typed CreateObject uncomment test cases, remove todo More tests and tiny fixes Add a JsonTypeInfoResolver.Combine test for JsonSerializerContext (#4) * Fix JsonTypeInfoResolver.Combine for JsonSerializerContext * Break up failing test Fix simple scenarios for combining contexts (#6) * Fix simple scenarios for combining contexts * feedback JsonSerializerContext combine test with different camel casing Remove unneeded virtual calls & branching when accessing Get & Set delegates (#7) JsonPropertyInfo tests everything minus ShouldSerialize & NumberHandling Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonConverterOfT.cs Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonConverterOfT.cs throw InvalidOperationException rather than ArgumentNullException for source gen when PropertyInfo.Name is assigned through JsonPropertyInfoValues tests for duplicated property names and JsonPropertyInfo.NumberHandling Add tests for NumberHandling and failing tests for ShouldSerialize disable the failing test and add extra checks disable remainder of the failing ShouldSerialize tests, fix working one Fix ShouldSerialize and IgnoreCondition interop Add failing tests for CreateObject + parametrized constructors Fix CreateObject support for JsonConstructor types (#10) * Fix CreateObject support for JsonConstructor types * address feedback Make contexts more combinator friendly (#9) * Make contexts more combinator friendly * remove converter cache * redesign test to account for JsonConstructorAttribute * Combine unit tests * address feedback * Add acceptance tests for DataContract attributes & Specified pattern (#11) * Add private field serialization acceptance test (#13) * tests, PR feedback (#14) * PR feedback and extra tests * Shorten class name, remove incorrect check (not true for polimorphic cases) * Make parameter matching for custom properties map property Name with parameter (#16) * Test static initialization with JsonTypeInfo (#17) * Fix test failures and proper fix this time (#18) * Fix test failures and proper fix this time * reinstate ActiveIssueAttribute * PR feedback and adjust couple of tests which don't set TypeInfoResolver * fix IAsyncEnumerable tests * Lock JsonSerializerOptions in JsonTypeInfo.EnsureConfigured() Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <eirik.tsarpalis@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <eirik.tsarpalis@gmail.com>
Please review 😄