Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: embed tls certs in istio package #32

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jeff-mccoy
Copy link
Member

Description

Embed the uds.dev certs into the package by default in preparation for future helm override features. In the interim, the Node version still works, and the README was updated to explain this.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Other (security config, docs update, etc)

Checklist before merging

@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2023 21:03
@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy merged commit fb04fee into main Nov 13, 2023
4 checks passed
@jeff-mccoy jeff-mccoy deleted the istio-cert-things branch November 13, 2023 21:59
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ tls:
# The secret name for the TLS certificate when not using passthrough mode
secretName: gw-cert

# For TLS SIMPLE mode, the TLS certificate data for the gateway
# For TLS SIMPLE mode, the TLS certificate data for the gateway (not base64 encoded)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I'm too late to the review, but I think this update to the comment is confusing since the value passed in here has to be base64 encoded. Tracking that the secret does not do the base64 encoding anymore, but the value comment should be written from a user perspective (something like For TLS SIMPLE mode, the base64 encoded TLS certificate data for the gateway).

If you all agree I can PR the small change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants