Skip to content

MatrixDoc_ClausalModifiers

KristenHowell edited this page May 9, 2018 · 10 revisions

Documentation for the Grammar Matrix Customization Clausal Modifiers Library

Versions 16 – 22

By Kristen Howell

Introduction

This document presents background information on the clausal modifiers library of the Grammar Matrix Customization System (Bender et al., 2002; Bender and Flickinger, 2005; Bender et al., 2010) and provides instructions for filling out this section of the questionnaire. General instructions for using the questionnaire can be found here.

Citing the Clausal Modifier Library

= Adverbial Clausal Modifiers =

Drawing from the typological survey of Thompson et al. (2007) and description in Li and Thompson (1989), we divide adverbial clausal modifiers into three basic strategies: Those marked by a free subordinator morpheme (1), those marked by a free subordinator morpheme pair (one in the subordinate clause and one in the matrix clause) (2), and those marked by special verbal morphology (but no free subordinator) (3).

(1) Ame ga agaru to, Gon wa hotto shite ana kara haidemashita

rain NOM stop when Gon TOP relief performing hole from snuck.out

`When the rain stopped, Gon got relieved and came out of the hole' [jpn] (Thompson et al., 2007)

(2) Yīnwèi tiān hēi le, suǒyǐ wǒ méi chǖ-qu

because sky black CRS so I no exit-go

`Because it had gotten dark, I didn't go out.' [cmn] (Li and Thompson, 1989)

(3) Yaʔáʃ ŋéŋi $uŋá-l kí-ʃ pu-wá-qi-pi

man leave.remote woman house.ACC her-sweep-PURP

`The man left in order for the woman to sweep the house' [lui] (Thompson et al., 2007)

Further variation among clausal modifier strategies is described under Options.

Options

[This section is currently under construction.] The Clausal Modifiers page allows users to define any number of clausal modifier strategies, which may vary in the following ways.

Clausal Modifier Position

The clausal modifier can occur strictly before, strictly after or freely before or after the constituent it modifies.

Clausal Modifier Attachment

The clausal modifier can attach to a verb phrases, sentences or either.

Subordinate Predication

The subordinate predication can be contributed one of three ways, which correspond to the three basic subordinator types described above:

(1) by a free subordinator morpheme

(2) by a free subordinator morpheme pair

(3) no free subordinator (in which case the predication is associated with a particular morphological form)

If the strategy uses a free subordinator morpheme or free subordinator morpheme pair, the user may add any number subordinators and their corresponding predication. If there is no free subordinator the user may only add one predication for that strategy.

The free subordinator morpheme pair includes a subordinator in the clausal modifier, that has the same options as a free subordinator, and a `pair' morpheme in the matrix clause which has it's own set of options.

Subordinator Position

A free subordinator can occur strictly before, strictly after, or freely before or after the VP or S it attaches too. Note that occurring freely before or after is only compatible with the adverb analysis described below.

Subordinator Type

The user may choose to analyze the subordinator as the head of it's clause (as an adposition) or as an adverb. Typically we recommend that the user treat the subordinator as a head unless there is evidence otherwise. Such evidence includes attaching at the VP level or occurring both at the beginning or end of the clause.

Subordinator Attachment

If the subordinator is the head of the subordinate clause, it attaches to the subordinate clause at the S level. If, however, it is an adverb, the user may select VP or S attachment (or both).

Subordinator Pair Adverb

Under the subordinate pair analysis, the adverb in the matrix clause has the same position and attachment choices as the adverb subordinator.

Special Morphology

Whether or not the strategy has a free subordinator, the user can add special morphological constraints on the subordinate verb. Current supported features include:

-Form

-NMZ

-Aspect

-Mood

-Syntactic features (under HEAD) defined on the Other Features subpage)

Some common examples include:

-A non-finite verb is required: check the box to add FORM on the Other Features page. Then click "Add a feature" in the clausal modifier strategy and select FORM non-finite.

-Subjunctive mood is required: define the Mood on the Tense, Aspect, Mood Subpage. Then Select Mood subjunctive for the clausal modifier strategy.

-The subordinate clause must be nominalized: Define a nominalization strategy on the Nominalized Clauses subpage. Then add nominalization "your strategy" to the clausal modifier strategy. If the language uses different nominalization morphemes in different clausal modifier strategies, we recommend creating a feature on the other features page (under HEAD) that is for both nominal and verbal categories. Associate this feature with the morphological rule that adds the nominalization feature and with the appropriate clausal modifier strategy.

Subject Sharing

If the subject is shared between the matrix and subordinate clause and is unexpressed in the subordinate clause, the user should check "Yes" for subject sharing.

Analyses

We add lexical supertypes for adposition and adverb subordinators as follows:

If the subordinator is an adposition:

adposition-subord-lex-item := single-rel-lex-item & norm-ltop-lex-item &
  [ SYNSEM.LOCAL.CAT [ MC -,
                       HEAD adp &
                            [ MOD < [ LOCAL scopal-mod &
                                            [ CAT [ HEAD verb,
                                                    VAL.COMPS < > ] ] ] > ],
                       VAL [ SUBJ < >,
                             SPR < >,
                             COMPS < [ OPT -,
                                       LOCAL.CAT [ MC -,
                                                   VAL.COMPS < > ] ] > ] ] ].

We create the following subtype of adposition-subord-lex-item if the subordinate clause is verbal (a separate subtype is added if the subordinate clause is nominalized)

subord-with-verbal-comp-lex := adposition-subord-lex-item &
  [ SYNSEM [ LOCAL [ CAT [ HEAD.MOD < [ LOCAL [ CAT.HEAD verb,
                                                CONT.HOOK [ LTOP #mod,
                                                            INDEX #index ] ] ] >,
                           VAL.COMPS < [ LOCAL [ CAT.HEAD verb,
                                                 CONT.HOOK.LTOP #comps ] ] > ],
                     CONT [ HCONS <! qeq &
                                     [ HARG #h1,
                                       LARG #mod ], qeq &
                                                    [ HARG #h2,
                                                      LARG #comps ] !>,
                            HOOK.INDEX #index ] ],
             LKEYS.KEYREL [ ARG1 #h1,
                            ARG2 #h2 ] ] ].

If the subordinator is an adverb:

adverb-subord-lex-item := no-rels-hcons-lex-item &
  [ SYNSEM.LOCAL.CAT [ VAL [ SUBJ < >,
                             SPR < >,
                             COMPS < > ],
                       HEAD adv &
                            [ MOD < [ SUBORDINATED none,
                                      LOCAL intersective-mod &
                                            [ CAT [ MC -,
                                                    HEAD verb ] ] ] > ] ] ].

For adverbs subordinators and clausal modifier strategies with no free subordinator (subordination is morphological), a we define unary rules to add the subordinate predication and to add the matrix clause to the subordinate clauses MOD list. The unary rule is associated with a clause that has the appropriate adverb or morphological form via the SUBORDINATED feature.

For adverb subordinators:

adv-marked-subord-clause-phrase := unary-phrase &
  [ SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT [ MC -,
                         VAL [ SPR < >,
                               COMPS < >,
                               SPEC < >,
                               SUBJ #subj ],
                         HEAD adp &
                              [ MOD < [ LOCAL scopal-mod &
                                              [ CAT [ HEAD verb,
                                                      VAL [ SPR < >,
                                                            COMPS < > ] ],
                                                CONT.HOOK [ LTOP #mcl,
                                                            INDEX #index ] ] ] > ] ],
                   COORD - ],
    C-CONT [ RELS <! arg12-ev-relation &
                     [ ARG1 #mch,
                       ARG2 #sch ] !>,
             HCONS <! qeq &
                      [ HARG #mch,
                        LARG #mcl ], qeq &
                                     [ HARG #sch,
                                       LARG #scl ] !>,
             HOOK.INDEX #index ],
    ARGS < [ SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT [ HEAD verb &
                                       [ MOD < > ],
                                  VAL [ SUBJ #subj,
                                        SPR < >,
                                        COMPS < >,
                                        SPEC < > ] ],
                            CONT.HOOK.LTOP #scl,
                            COORD - ] ] > ].

For morphological subordination:

morphological-subord-clause-phrase := unary-phrase &
  [ SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT [ MC -,
                         VAL [ SUBJ #subj,
                               SPR < >,
                               COMPS < > ],
                         HEAD adp &
                              [ MOD < [ LOCAL scopal-mod &
                                              [ CAT [ HEAD verb,
                                                      VAL [ SPR < >,
                                                            COMPS < > ] ],
                                                CONT.HOOK [ LTOP #mcl,
                                                            INDEX #index ] ] ] > ] ],
                   COORD - ],
    C-CONT [ RELS <! [ ARG1 #mch,
                       ARG2 #sch ] !>,
             HCONS <! qeq &
                      [ HARG #mch,
                        LARG #mcl ], qeq &
                                     [ HARG #sch,
                                       LARG #scl ] !>,
             HOOK.INDEX #index ],
    ARGS < [ SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT [ HEAD verb,
                                  MC na-or-+,
                                  VAL [ SUBJ #subj,
                                        SPR < >,
                                        COMPS < > ] ],
                            CONT.HOOK.LTOP #scl,
                            COORD - ] ] > ].

For each strategy, we create subtypes of the lexical types and unary rules to constrain the strategy according to the user's choices. These are specified on the lexical type or unary rule as detailed in the following chart.

References

Charles N Li and Sandra A Thompson. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Univ of California Press.

Sandra A Thompson, Robert E Longacre, and Shin Ja J Hwang. 2007. Adverbial clauses. Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 2: Complex constructions. ed. by Timothy Shopen. 237269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clone this wiki locally