Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supplemental Claims | Weekly Check-In #56057

Closed
5 tasks
saderagsdale opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed
5 tasks

Supplemental Claims | Weekly Check-In #56057

saderagsdale opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
bmt-team-1 Benefits Management Tools Team #1 Decision-Reviews-Team (Formerly squad-2) Label for issues being worked on by Decision Reviews on BMT & DR team

Comments

@saderagsdale
Copy link
Contributor

saderagsdale commented Mar 30, 2023

How to use this ticket

This is a daily checklist for monitoring the health of our release. Tasks for this ticket should be completed first thing at the beginning of each day, and reported to the internal team and key stakeholders. Below are the metrics used to gauge the health of the release. See these links for details on the release or rollback plan, and incident monitoring plan.

Links to the dashboard(s) showing "success criteria" metrics

User experience metrics

Abandonment rate <20%
Contact Center calls due to inability to complete the form caused by technical error <2 calls

Error rate metrics

Green: "everything is going smooth" - < 0.1%
Yellow: "we should give this a look" - 0.1% - 0.5%
Red: "stop everything, we need to check this out" - > 0.5%
Evidence "gate check" metrics (thresholds will be higher - LH is used to a higher error rate through the Benefits Intake API):

Green: "everything is going smooth" - < 2.5%
Yellow: "we should give this a look" - 2.5% - 4%
Red: "stop everything, we need to check this out" - > 4% (edited)


Tasks

  • Engineering: Post the FE and BE error metrics for the previous day, including the type of error and intervention needed.
  • Product: Reach out to Kimberley Daniels for an update on Contact Center calls in #vsp-contact-center-support
  • Product: Craft an update with input from engineering, share with Matt Self, Alejandro M, and LH Banana Peels team.
  • Product: At the end of the 5-day observation period, get buy-in from Matt Self, Alejandro M, and LH Banana Peels team before increasing the release.
  • Product: Communicate any changes in the release plan to the stakeholders above and update the release plan.
@saderagsdale saderagsdale added the bmt-team-1 Benefits Management Tools Team #1 label Mar 30, 2023
@saderagsdale saderagsdale self-assigned this Mar 30, 2023
@saderagsdale saderagsdale added the Decision-Reviews-Team (Formerly squad-2) Label for issues being worked on by Decision Reviews on BMT & DR team label Mar 30, 2023
@dorseypa1
Copy link

Hi, I need access to the Dashboard Product Details related to this request. Thank you

@saderagsdale
Copy link
Contributor Author

saderagsdale commented Apr 19, 2023

@saderagsdale add domo link and error page

@saderagsdale
Copy link
Contributor Author

Backend Evidence Error Summaries
Upstream status: Errors: Batch Submitted with all blank Images.;
description: PDF was all blank pages (2)
occurrences: 1
resubmitted: no
mitigation plan: No further action taken, the veteran uploaded a PDF with 2 blank pages. DataDimensions strips out blank pages. If it does that, and then there are no pages left, it returns this error.
Non-string values for keys: zipCode
Description: Upload metadata zipCode was null
occurrences: 1
resubmitted: yes
mitigation plan: PR is in that will use the frontend submitted zip code as a backup, if the user’s info coming back from MPI has null (missing) zip code.
Maximum page size exceeded. Limit is 21 in x 21 in.
Description: PDF exceeded 21x21 dimensions
occurrences: 2
resubmitted: not yet, but working on it
mitigation plan: Lighthouse has removed their 21x21 check, this reduces the frequency of dimensional errors. Now, files up to 78x101 can go though. That is the limit of the NEXT downstream system (doma/datadimension). They are looking into if these can be removed, but very very very small % of evidence is exceeding this size. We have not hit another evidence submission dimensional error since lighthouse removed their 21x21 check, as most files that are over 21x21 are only slightly over, and still under the datadimension’s higher limit
pdfinfo exited with status 1 and message Syntax Error: Couldn’t find trailer dictionary\n\nSyntax Error: Couldn’t find trailer dictionary\n\nSyntax Error: Couldn’t read xref table\n
Description: Corrupt PDF file. Could not open it on any system in any way.
occurrences: 1
resubmitted: no
mitigation plan: No plan to do anything with this. The veteran uploaded this file in a corrupt state.
pdfinfo exited with status 1 and message Command Line Error: Incorrect password\n
Description: Lighthouse reports file has a password
occurrences: 1
resubmitted: no
mitigation plan: Investigating. This is not supposed to be able to happen. No PDF with a password should be able to get to Lighthouse. Our frontend prompts for the password and the backend should remove it before passing along.

@kylesoskin
Copy link
Contributor

reformatted version of my above comment posted by @saderagsdale

==
Backend Evidence Error Summaries****

  1. Upstream status: Errors: Batch Submitted with all blank Images.;

    1. description: PDF was all blank pages (2)
    2. occurrences: 1
    3. resubmitted: no
    4. mitigation plan: no further action taken, the veteran uploaded a PDF with 2 blank pages. DataDimensions strips out blank pages. If it does that, and then there are no pages left, it returns this error. There is not really anything else to do here in my opinion
  2. Non-string values for keys: zipCode

    1. Description: Upload metadata zipCode was null
    2. occurrences: 1
    3. resubmitted: yes
    4. mitigation plan: PR is in that will use the frontend submitted zip code as a backup, if the user’s info coming back from MPI has null (missing) zip code. 
  3. Maximum page size exceeded. Limit is 21 in x 21 in.

    1. Description: PDF exceeded 21x21 dimensions
    2. occurrences: 2
    3. resubmitted: not yet, but working on it
    4. mitigation plan: Lighthouse has removed their 21x21 check, this reduces the frequency of dimensional errors. Now, files up to 78x101 can go though. That is the limit of the NEXT downstream system (doma/datadimension). They are looking into if these can be removed, but very very very small % of evidence is exceeding this size. We have not hit another evidence submission dimensional error since lighthouse removed their 21x21 check, as most files that are over 21x21 are only slightly over, and still under the datadimension’s higher limit
  4. pdfinfo exited with status 1 and message Syntax Error: Couldn't find trailer dictionary\n\\nSyntax Error: Couldn't find trailer dictionary\n\\nSyntax Error: Couldn't read xref table\n

    1. Description: Corrupt PDF file. Could not open it on any system in any way.
    2. occurrences: 1
    3. resubmitted: no
    4. mitigation plan: No plan to do anything with this. The file is corrupt in some way we are unsure of. I am not sure if we should do anything here with this to try and resolve? The veteran uploaded this file in a corrupt state, so… not much I can think of to do
  5. pdfinfo exited with status 1 and message Command Line Error: Incorrect password\n

    1. Description: Lighthouse reports file has a password
    2. occurrences: 1
    3. resubmitted: no
    4. mitigation plan: still in progress/investigating. This is NOT supposed to be able to happen. No PDF with a password should be able to get to Lighthouse. Our frontend prompts for the password and the backend should remove it before passing along. So, still need to dig further on this one for an explanation. 

@saderagsdale saderagsdale changed the title Supplemental Claims | Launch Monitoring Daily Check-In Supplemental Claims | Weekly Check-In May 3, 2023
@saderagsdale
Copy link
Contributor Author

Heather will schedule a reminder for Monday mornings. Should be done sending weekly updates in mid-June.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bmt-team-1 Benefits Management Tools Team #1 Decision-Reviews-Team (Formerly squad-2) Label for issues being worked on by Decision Reviews on BMT & DR team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants