Consider cutting a 2.0.4 with RA type resolution fix #3594
Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
I'm happy to issue another patch release there if someone backports the relevant PR. If we do another patch release I would like to include the following PR's: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
OK, let me give that a try. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I tried cutting the hotfix branch, but I'm having trouble cherry-picking #3563 -- my apologies but I'm not familiar enough with the internals to resolve these conflicts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sorry, I deleted my comment because I noticed the same problem. I'm trying to ensure I don't regress on the quote issue. PR is #3597 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @weiznich,
Firstly, thank you for your work on b024f20 to fix Rust Analyzer. It's hard to work on a large Diesel project without RA, so I'm glad you were able to fix it in Diesel! It's a shame RA doesn't support the 2015-style resolution, but I'm glad Diesel could work around it.
I was going to change my project to use diesel as a git dependency, so that I can pull that commit into my project and get RA working again. But my project uses several other crates that all use diesel 2.0 from crates.io.
In my opinion, a lot of Rust programmers are probably affected by RA-diesel problems, so maybe it's worth cutting a new branch from 2.0.3, cherry-picking the type resolution commit in, and releasing that as diesel 2.0.4?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions